1802/'1' $2.50 MS61 认证号43152313, PCGS号7650

CAC Eliasberg/Clapp BD-1

Ron Guth

It's time to revisit this date in light of modern research and opinions.  As David Akers noted, the "overdate" on the 1802 Quarter Eagle is indistinct.  Harry Bass questioned whether this was an overdate at all, and John Dannreuther (co-author with Bass on "Early U.S. Gold Coin Varieties: A Study of Die States 1795-1834") called it a regular 1802.  PCGS recognizes the variety as 1802/'1' with single quotation marks around the 1, indicating its questionable status.  I suspect that in the future, this nod to tradition will be removed, consistent with Dannreuther's treatment.

This date is scarce, plain and simple.  However, ample supplies exist in most grades to satisfy collector demand, which comes primarily from type buyers.  In Mint State, this date is very rare, though the PCGS CoinFacts Condition Census consists of all MS63 or better examples.  Two NGC MS65 examples appear to be the best exmples of this date.

Most 1802 Quarter Eagles show central weakness at the centers and on the reverse stars.  Adjustment marks can be seen on the occasional example, but they appear to be the exception rather than the rule.

---

David Akers (1975/88)

One of the most common dates of this type. Although "2 Over 1" overdates in most series are generally very distinct, such is not the case with this quarter eagle, and on many specimens that I have seen, one must use a little imagination to see the overdate. For the third consecutive issue, the 13 obverse stars are arranged differently; namely 8 stars to the left and 5 to the right. Choice examples do exist, but they are very rare, and as auction records indicate, the vast majority of available specimens are EF or less. Typical of this type, most 1802/1 quarter eagles are weakly struck.